Thesis
Northrop Grumman's revenue grew from $41.03 billion in 2024 (10-K) to $41.95 billion in 2025 (10-K), about 2%, the slowest among the large defense primes with 2025 figures on Hangar (L3Harris's 2025 revenue is not available in its XBRL data).
Its remaining performance obligations (RPO) rose from $95.7 billion at December 31, 2025 (same 10-K) to $109.6 billion at September 30, 2026 (10-Q), up 15% in nine months. RPO is about 2.6 times 2025 revenue.
My view: backlog growing this much faster than revenue should lift revenue growth above 2025's 2%.
Evidence
- From April to September 2026, Hangar counts $5.5 billion of definite awards to Northrop Grumman in Department of War announcements; most of the RPO increase came from elsewhere (classified work is not announced, and RPO includes non-defense customers).
Catalysts
- The 2026 10-K and the 2027 quarterly reports.
Risks / what would prove me wrong
- A large share of Northrop's work is classified, so outsiders can't see what drives the backlog.
- Fixed-price development programs can lose money if costs run over.
- I'm wrong if revenue for the four quarters ending September 2027 grows 3% or less compared with the four quarters before.
Valuation
No view on valuation here: this is a call on revenue growth, and Hangar shows no prices. A student's opinion, not investment advice.